Login Register

Boise Home Builder

Ask anyone in Boise who the most educated home builder is and which home builder has earned the most credentials and the answer will unanimously be Chuck Miller. Chuck Miller is so qualified to discuss home construction he is many times the trainer at contnuing education courses for realtors and builders around Treasure Valley, ID. Boise home builder Chuck Miller was one of Idaho's first Energy Star builders and recently became the first certified Green Building Professional by the National Association of Home Builders in Idaho.

Thanks for reading

Boise Home Builder Blog

Boise Home Builder
Boise Home Builder Chuck Miller Construction

Chuck Miller.jpg
Boise Home Builder:
Chuck Miller  
(208) 229-2553
Company Profile

Ask Chuck!

Learn more-
View Chuck's Video
 

Portfolio of Homes

View

 

Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Main / Boise Home Builder  

The Idaho Business Review reported on Wednesday that default filings remained high in June in Ada and Canyon counties after declining in May. IdahoDataProviders.com who published the report had viewed Mays decline as a positive sign for the local real estate. But they stated in their newly published release that foreclosure filings for June are back up to previous levels, continuing the trend of steadily increasing foreclosures supporting their position that the number of Idaho homes entering into foreclosure will continue to climb for the rest of 2008.

 

Does This Constitute a Crisis?
 
I guess that depends on your perspective. If you are a homeowner faced with losing your home and all of the implications that a short sale or foreclosure will have on your future ability to obtain credit, the answer is yes. Or if you are a lender faced with a rising number of non-performing loans, the answer is probably yes. 
 
But a close examination of the facts shows that for most of Ada and Canyon county and for much of the country, there is no foreclosure crisis. Certainly there is no question that rising foreclosure rates are a serious problem. Nationally, the Mortgage Bankers Association’s latest survey shows that more than 1 million homes are now in foreclosure and that the national foreclosure rate stands at a record high of 2.5 percent. But the Mortgage Bankers Association’s data shows that most foreclosures are concentrated in the once super-heated markets in four states: California, Florida, Arizona and Nevada. In fact, these four states account for 42 percent of all foreclosures nationwide and 89 percent of the total increase in new home foreclosures according to MBA’s 2008 first quarter data. The MBA further notes that 20 states reported declines in the number of foreclosures started during this period, including Michigan, Ohio and Indiana where problems have been the most severe in recent years.
 
But it’s also important to remember that 37 percent of all single-family homes in the United States are owned debt-free – without any mortgage – and that home owners nationwide have built up $9 trillion in equity that provides a good cushion against any decline in values. The MBA report also shows that the vast majority of American home owners who do have mortgages are making their mortgage payments on time. If fact, more than 96 percent of prime borrowers – the bulk of the mortgage market - are up-to-date on their payments. The problem is in the subprime market. Nationally, about 19 percent of subprime borrowers are behind on their mortgage payments.
 
It’s also important to note that a high percentage of foreclosed loans to date – particularly in California, Arizona, Nevada and Florida – have been among speculators or investors who were looking for quick profits and just walked away from their investments when the housing market cooled. Do you remember when Boise was being touted in national publications as a great place to invest in real estate? I can’t help but wonder how many of the short sales and foreclosures in Ada and Canyon counties involve speculators or investors who were looking for quick profits. I do know that of the 5,080 active listings in the MLS as of the end of June, 775 or approximately 15% were listed as New Never Occupied, only 121 or approximately 2.4% are less than I year old, 1,328 or approximately 26% are between 1 and 5 years old, and approximately 50% of the 5,080 active listing are currently vacant. I also know that when the speculators converged on Boise and began contacting home builders with offers to buy all our existing inventory – completed or under construction, most builders and developers declined. We didn’t want to be competing against these investors for home buyers in the future.  Many developments actually placed owner-occupancy deed restrictions on their new home sales.  As a result, the only option for most speculators or investors was to purchase existing homes. Although there doesn’t seem to be any hard data to support my theory, I suspect based on the available data, that the incongruent number of 1-5 year old homes and the increases in short sales and foreclosures we are experiencing locally is attributable in large part to speculators – many of whom purchased their “investments” with subprime mortgages. 
 
So in my opinion, while there is a serious problem, I don't believe it constitutes a crisis.
 
 
 
 
 
In my next blog, I’ll talk a bit more about the problem and what I believe can be done to address it. 
 
Chuck Miller GMB   CGB   MIRM   CMP   MCSP   CSP
President / Builder – Chuck Miller Construction Inc.
(208) 229-2553
 
Posted by Chuck Miller at 7/3/2008 4:46 PM Permalink | Trackback
Comments (12)
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Chuck- Rumor has Indy Mac filing for BK Monday AM. (Sunday eom) - no crisis they only make a few loans a year
Posted by emdeplam on 7/7/2008 12:50 AM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
The problem is much more than subprime. I can pull you data if you wish...Alt A is the shoe dropping now and it is bigger. Prime is at record default rates. We are SEEING DEFAULT RATES EQUAL TO THE START OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION!

What does the avergae foreclosure go for (discount)...okay boom the prices of all homes on that block just dropped by that much.

When do we call it a crisis. WHEN Boise drops 15% from here will that be a crisis? How much more inventory do you want before you call it a crisis? How many more BK builders? I know I know we need a couple local banks to go bk...probably not this year.

Commercial RE natonally with higher defaults than residential...

and the kicker is we are still not at 3x median income to median price.

Maybe the layoffs at HP, Micron etc will not hurt the market either...which was is empolyment going

Using your definition of crisis, I suspect that is when I will buy. I am now using you as my leading indicator..when you finally admit we have a housing crisis...I will start looking for property :-)
Posted by emdeplam on 7/7/2008 12:57 AM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Nationwide decline of 15.2% this year is worse than any period in the Great Depression. Worst ever...that I can find records for...welcome to America's Tulip Mania :-)

but I agree...let's wait for another 15-20% before we wave the crisis flag
Posted by emdeplam on 7/7/2008 1:00 AM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
The previous commenter makes some interesting points. I am (proudly) in the mortgage industry. Admittedly, there are some severe problems in our industry today caused by some irresponsible lending in the past. I won't beat that dead horse, we all know about the subprime debacle, etc...
There are also overall problems in the economy, not the least of which is inflation, rising fuel costs, falling dollar, higher unemployment, etc... We have the "perfect storm" of a weak economy right now, and then we have the media stirring the pot with doom and gloom, sensationalized stories, and their incessant fear mongering! Personally, I blame the media for a significant portion of the economic difficulties, as they aren't happy if we start on any road to recovery, because it just isn't as interesting a story! But, to get off my soapbox...
Chuck makes the point that the majority of the foreclosure problem is with the subprime mortgages, and he is correct. Unfortunately a majority is not "all", and I've seen some "prime" borrowers in difficulty as well, which can mainly be attributed to the economic difficulties. But the reality is, the vast majority of short sales and foreclosures are subprime borrowers.
The commenter makes the argument again and again that there needs to be a 3X median income to median price, and we aren't there. According to CNN Money's 2006 Best Places to Live, Boise's median income is $58,489, but the purchasing power (adjusted for cost of living) is $64,133. The average median house price was $183,008 at the same time. Based on the 3X theory, and purchasing power, the median house price should be $192,399 - $9391 more than the actual! So, at least in 2006, we were at the 3X. Granted, these are 2006 statistics, right after the pinnacle of our real estate market. So, if prices have dropped so substantially, it would stand to reason that we are at least hitting the 3X median to median goal.
So, to make a point... Crisis? While some in other markets would argue with me, I maintain that in this market, we are not at crisis point. Difficult times? Yes. Do I believe values will drop another 15 - 20%? Absolutely not! We in the industry are already noticing an improvement in our market. Housing sales are slowly but surely increasing, and while we have a hard row to hoe, it will get better. The first time homebuyer market is increasing substantially, as houses have become more affordable for this market. CNN Money ran a great article on June 24th entitled "On the Path to a Housing Rebound", which also focused strongly on the first time homebuyer.

Finally, at risk of being labeled a "pollyanna" let me make a point: We create our own destiny, we create our own reality. If you choose your reality and destiny based on doom and gloom and negativity, you will reap exactly what you sow. Our best hope for turning this economy and situation around is to work from a positive standpoint. Encourage each other, create opportunities for success! We collectively have the means to make a difference in our community, we just need to refuse to be bogged down by negative statistics and media garbage.
Posted by Anonymous on 7/7/2008 12:15 PM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
"We create our own destiny" so go out and buy an overpriced house? I get how that's a commisioned sales persons destiny but for the consumer?

I won't even bother with the rest of the rah rah sales pitch. JUST BE 100% CLEAR that the poster of those remarks WOULD HAVE TOLD YOU the same thing 1 year ago...and today you would have lost 5-15% The called me crazy then!

BIG NEWS TODAY FRE -30% that's freddie Mac folks headed down the tube. FASB- is catch ing them- there a toxic waste dump of accounting! THEY WILL BE A BIG 0 ! Not today, but pull a stock chart! Their capital ratos are in severe danger...

Ask the board here what happens whe Freddie and Fannie stop buying loans or slow down. HOUSING STOPS!

THIS Situaton is FAR worse than the main stream media is portraying it!

Posted by emdeplam on 7/7/2008 1:03 PM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Oh and the price to income is 3.6 >>>> you don't adjust income for purchasing power
Posted by emdeplam on 7/7/2008 1:08 PM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Emdeplam,

When I stated that the problem is in the subprime market, I was actually referring to all mortgages that are not prime, which includes both subprime and Alt A. I apologize for not making that clear. Because Alt-A loans are the financing of choice for most non-owner occupied, investment properties, I was referring to Alt A mortgages when I concluded that the increases in short sales and foreclosures we are experiencing locally is attributable in large part to speculators many if not most of whom purchased their investments with Alt A mortgages. I based my conclusion on the fact that approximately 50% of the 5,080 active listing are currently vacant and the fact that Alt A mortgages represent a far greater likelihood of borrower default than conventional, conforming mortgages, since people are more likely to abandon a property in which they do not live than they are to risk losing their primary homes.

Now let me address your first comment on the rumored bankruptcy of IndyMac Bank.

The dictionary defines a rumor as "an unverified account or explanation of events circulating from person to person and pertaining to an object, event, or issue in public concern." As a general rule, I try to verify the facts before disseminating information.

Here are the facts. IndyMac Bancorp Inc. did announced that it is working with U.S. regulators on a plan to shore up the company's "safety and soundness" and raise more capital. A spokesman for the U.S. Office of Thrift Supervision, which regulates IndyMac, stated "We're aware of the situation and we're working with them," but there is no mention on the OTS or the FDIC website of any formal action being taken. IndyMacs need to raise more capital was precipitated by news reports about a letter that U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) sent to the OTS and other federal regulators asking them to monitor IndyMac's financial health more closely. Those news reports and the rumors they generated sparked withdrawals of about $100 million of deposits at IndyMac's savings bank which amounted to about 0.5% of the banks total deposits. Regulators have advised the thrift operator that it is no longer considered "well-capitalized." IndyMac's risk-based capital was 10.26% of assets at the end of the first quarter, just above the 10% minimum needed to be classified as well-capitalized.depositors, IndyMac has approximately $18 billion in deposits and more than 96% of those deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

In the first quarter of 2008, IndyMac was the 11th-largest producer of U.S. home mortgages, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade publication. IndyMac specialized in Alt-A loans, a category between prime and subprime that typically involves borrowers who don't fully document their incomes or assets but was forced to shift to making loans that could be sold to federally chartered mortgage investors Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or insured by the Federal Housing Administration. IndyMac has been hit hard by rising defaults and falling home prices. In February, IndyMac posted the first annual loss in its 23-year history. IndyMac posted a $184.2 million loss for the first quarter of 2008 and said Monday that it is likely to report a loss for the second quarter bigger than the loss recorded in the first quarter. Citing its inability to raise capital, the bank decided that cutting back was its only option. So Indymac has stopped taking new loan submissions, is closing its mortgage forward business, and will cut more than half of its work force amid liquidity and capital ratio worries - and larger projected second-quarter losses.

Alt-A mortgages are "alternatives" to the gold standard of conforming, GSE-backed mortgages. This type of U.S. mortgage, for various reasons, is considered riskier than "prime" and less risky than "subprime," the riskiest category. Alt-A interest rates, which are determined by credit risk, therefore tend to be between those of prime and subprime home loans.

Within the U.S. mortgage industry, different mortgage products are generally defined by how they differ from the types of "conforming" or "agency" mortgages, ones guaranteed by the Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. There are numerous factors that might cause a mortgage not to qualify under the GSEs' lending guidelines even though the borrower's creditworthiness is generally strong. A few of the more important factors are:

Reduced borrower income and asset documentation (for example, "stated income", "stated assets", "no income verification")
Borrower debt to income ratios above what Fannie or Freddie will allow for the borrower credit, assets and type of property being financed
Credit history with too many problems to qualify for an "agency" loan, but not so many as to require a subprime loan (for example, low scores or serious delinquencies, but no recent charge-offs or bankruptcy)
Loan to value ratios (percentage of the property price being borrowed) above agency limits for the property, occupancy or borrower characteristics involved

One problem associated with Alt-A loans is the lack of necessary proof or documentation needed to be approved for a loan. As I already noted, because Alt-A loans are also the financing of choice for most non-owner occupied, investment properties, as a class they represent a far greater likelihood of borrower default than conventional, conforming mortgages, since people are more likely to abandon a property in which they do not live than they are to risk losing their primary homes.



Chuck Miller GMB CGB MIRM CMP MCSP CSP
President / Builder Chuck Miller Construction Inc.
(208) 229-2553
chuck@chuckmillerconstruction.com
www.chuckmillerconstruction.com

Posted by Chuck Miller on 7/8/2008 1:38 PM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
NY Times article "Spike in mortgage foreclosure goes well beyond subprime"
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/business/01town.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
You can even see Boise as a huge spike >200% increase in PRIME foreclosures.

Housing Wire reported on what appeared to be emerging problems in prime jumbos a few weeks ago, when reviewing S&P latest remittance summaries. Total delinquencies for prime jumbos originated in 2006 rose 15.4 percent during March, while the 2007 vintage saw DQs ratchet upward by 15.5 percent ?keep in mind, that? on a monthly comparison basis, to boot. Serious delinquencies rose even higher, jumping 22.6 percent for the 2006 vintage and 18.8 percent for the 2007s.

Last figure I got from S&P was natonally 45% of foreclosures are PRIME

As to Indy... well I was a day prior to the announcement--- so of course it was rumor... FDIC (in my opinion) is using an old take down method from the S&L days...they are in work off the assets mode...they need max deposit value in this process to facilitate the take down so they will not formally announce death. Be sure they are dead.

You cannot have a recovery in housing with lender after lender tightening, withdrawing or folding...Indy will have other friends before this is done.

Keep you deposits under 100K
Posted by emdeplam on 7/9/2008 8:05 AM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Indy Mac----FDIC is following a model used by FSLIC in the early part of the S&L crisis, e.g. Antelope Valley Savings:

Shut off new loan origination and layoff that staff

Get servicing portfolio in position to be sold

Keep branches open and keep taking deposits so the branches and deposits can be sold to others, without liabilities attached

Keep skeleton crew to work on defaulted loans and REO sales, for now

Forbid brokered deposits

New has deposits > cash by $12B
Posted by emdeplam on 7/9/2008 9:41 AM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Emdeplam,

I went to the New York Times article and looked at the graphic which indicated that prime mortgages foreclosures in the Boise MSA increased more than 200% from February '07 to February '08. That is certainly a huge increase and some people might look at that increase and see a crisis. But let's look at the facts. In all of 2007, there were 2,206 foreclosures in Boise or 1 for every 99 households. That's a foreclosure rate of 1% so a 200%+ increase would equate to a foreclosure rate of 2%+.

In response to your other comments, here is an excerpt from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 1st Quarter 2008 Report on U.S. Housing and Market Conditions:

Total delinquencies for all loans past due were at 5.82 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, up 4 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and up 18 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006. Delinquencies for past due subprime loans were at 17.31 percent, up 6 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and were up 30 percent from the fourth quarter of the previous year. Subprime adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans that were past due stood at 20.02 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, up 6 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and up 39 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006.
Ninety-day delinquencies for all loans were at 1.48 percent, up 17 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and up 54 percent from the fourth quarter a year ago. Subprime loans that were 90 days past due stood at 5.42 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, up 17 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and up 73 percent from the fourth quarter 2006. Subprime ARMs loans that were 90 days past due were at 6.64 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007, up 29 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and up 96 percent from the fourth quarter 2006.

During the fourth quarter of 2007, 0.83 percent of all loans entered foreclosure, up 6 percent from the third quarter of 2007 and up 54 percent from the fourth quarter of the previous year. In the subprime category 3.44 percent of loans entered foreclosure in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of 10 percent over the third quarter of 2007 and an increase of 72 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006. In the subprime ARMs category, 5.29 percent of loans went into foreclosure in the fourth quarter of 2007, an increase of 12 percent over the third quarter of 2007 and an increase of 96 percent from the fourth quarter of 2006.

Chuck Miller GMB CGB MIRM CMP MCSP CSP
President / Builder Chuck Miller Construction Inc.
(208) 229-2553
chuck@chuckmillerconstruction.com
www.chuckmillerconstruction.com
Posted by Chuck Miller on 7/9/2008 12:08 PM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
iNDY - ITS ALL OVER
Posted by emdeplam on 7/12/2008 12:38 AM
Re:Does the Rise in Foreclosures Constitute a Crisis?
Emdeplam,

You were right. Here are some excerpts from the Office of Thrift Supervision's Press Release at 6:00 pm EDT yesterday:

The OTS has determined that the current institution, IndyMac Bank, is unlikely to be able to meet continued depositors demands in the normal course of business and is therefore in an unsafe and unsound condition. The immediate cause of the closing was a deposit run that began and continued after the public release of a June 26 letter to the OTS and the FDIC from Senator Charles Schumer of New York. The letter expressed concerns about IndyMacs viability. In the following 11 business days, depositors withdrew more than $1.3 billion from their accounts.

This institution failed today due to a liquidity crisis, OTS Director John Reich said. Although this institution was already in distress, I am troubled by any interference in the regulatory process.

As a result of an OTS examination that began in January 2008, the OTS deemed IndyMac to be in troubled condition. An overwhelming majority of problem institutions are able to successfully modify their operations and business plans, work closely with their regulator and eventually return to a healthy condition.

IndyMac had reacted to market conditions and OTS concerns in November 2007 by changing its operations and business plan to build a foundation for recovery. IndyMac was actively seeking to arrange a significant capital infusion or find a buyer. The recent release of the senators letter undermined the public confidence essential for a financial institution and took away the time IndyMac needed to pursue a recovery.

The OTS Fact Sheet provided the following information:

- Deposit inflows in the three days prior to June 27, 2008: $31.2 million
- Deposit outflows beginning June 27, 2008: $730.2 million through July 7 and $1.3 billion through July 10

- Loan servicing (March 2008 10-Q statement): $184.5 billion in loans serviced for others, including 16 percent pay-option ARMs, 10 percent reverse mortgages and 39 percent fixed-rate mortgages
- Loan servicing portfolio delinquency rate: 8.26 percent

I invite you to read my next blog which I will be posting later today.

Chuck Miller GMB CGB MIRM CMP MCSP CSP
President / Builder Chuck Miller Construction Inc.
(208) 229-2553
chuck@chuckmillerconstruction.com
www.chuckmillerconstruction.com
Posted by Chuck Miller on 7/12/2008 11:34 AM
Add Comment
Provide comments on this blog entry. If you have an account with this site please sign in.

Thanks forReading

Boise Home Builder Blog

 

 
  Home  
  |  
  Idaho Subdivisions  
  |  
  ID Builders & Professionals  
  |  
[  Discussions  ]
  |  
  Idaho MLS